| Front | 84. Michael Fermin, without the authority of Pascual Lacas, owner of a car, sold the same car in the name of Mr. Lacas to Atty. Buko. The contract between Atty. Buko and Mr. Lacas is --- a) void because of the absence of consent from the owner, Mr. Lacas. b) valid because all of the essential requisites of a contract are present. c) unenforceable because Michael Fermin had no authority but he sold the car in the name of Mr. Lacas, the owner. d) rescissible because the contract caused lesion to Atty. Buko. |
|---|---|
| Back | SUGGESTED ANSWER: c) |
Tags: 2012, bar
Learn with these flashcards. Click next, previous, or up to navigate to more flashcards for this subject.
Next card: Sale b contracts void oral parcel land agent
Previous card: D consent representation authority contract voidable b rescissible
Up to card list: CIVIL LAW