Question

Q26.   In which of the following does the author of the passage reinforce his criticism of responses such as Isaacs' to Raisin in in the Sun   ? 093  标志：   /In which of the following/ does the author of the passage reinforce his criticism   /of responses (such as   Isaacs') to Raisin in the Sun   /? 请思考：题干所问的“作者加强其批评”是针对什么人的   ？ 复杂修饰+题干圈套

Accepted Answer

gre  意群训练： In which of the followin   g does the autho   r of the passag   e reinforce his criticis   m of response   s such as Isaacs   ' to Raisin in the Sun?    译文：   /在以下哪一个选项中/，文章的作者 加强了 他   /对（类似   I这样的）对于《太阳下的葡萄干》做出的反应的/批判呢   ？  解释：   为了对应原文，以上中文翻译显得很笨拙，请读者原谅。需要说明的是，本题号称GRE五大难题之一。对于此题的解法市面上众说纷纭，皆不得要领。笔者很高兴能够通过这本书把此题讲清楚，一来以正视听，二来解决同学们的疑难，三来揭示ETS出题者的叵测居心。此题之所以难解，是因为题干中藏有圈套。请仔细观察题干，它问的是作者对谁的批评？是对与I一伙的所有批评家的responses还是对I个人的responses做出的批评呢？当然是对所有的responses。出题者在此设下陷阱，让读者怎么看都像是对I的responses的批评，可是文章中对于I的描述并没有能和选项匹配的说法，因此用I到文中去定位，这道题当然无法做出；而文中对与I抱有相同观点的全体评论家们对《太阳下的葡萄干》一书的反应的描述十分清楚：Indeed, a curiously persistent refusal to credit Hansberry with a capacity for intentional irony has led some critics to interpret the play's thematic conflicts as mere confusion, contradiction, or eclecticism. Isaacs, for example, ...评论家们从一个错误的前提（即H不能作intentional irony）推出一个错误结论，那么我们的作者该怎么批评他们呢？当然要驳倒其assumption，说H是能作intentional irony的。我们于是看到了D选项，intentional的完美的同义词：well-considered。从本题中可以体会出，对于句子的阅读能力是多么重要！ 5

en	Q26. In which of the following does the author of the passage reinforce his criticism of responses such as Isaacs' to Raisin in in the Sun ?
category	gre
idx	093
parts	意群训练： In which of the followin g does the autho r of the passag e reinforce his criticis m of response s such as Isaacs ' to Raisin in the Sun?
mark	标志： /In which of the following/ does the author of the passage reinforce his criticism /of responses (such as Isaacs') to Raisin in the Sun /?
cn	译文： /在以下哪一个选项中/，文章的作者加强了他 /对（类似 I这样的）对于《太阳下的葡萄干》做出的反应的/批判呢？
tips	请思考：题干所问的“作者加强其批评”是针对什么人的？
explain	解释：为了对应原文，以上中文翻译显得很笨拙，请读者原谅。需要说明的是，本题号称GRE五大难题之一。对于此题的解法市面上众说纷纭，皆不得要领。笔者很高兴能够通过这本书把此题讲清楚，一来以正视听，二来解决同学们的疑难，三来揭示ETS出题者的叵测居心。此题之所以难解，是因为题干中藏有圈套。请仔细观察题干，它问的是作者对谁的批评？是对与I一伙的所有批评家的responses还是对I个人的responses做出的批评呢？当然是对所有的responses。出题者在此设下陷阱，让读者怎么看都像是对I的responses的批评，可是文章中对于I的描述并没有能和选项匹配的说法，因此用I到文中去定位，这道题当然无法做出；而文中对与I抱有相同观点的全体评论家们对《太阳下的葡萄干》一书的反应的描述十分清楚： Indeed, a curiously persistent refusal to credit Hansberry with a capacity for intentional irony has led some critics to interpret the play's thematic conflicts as mere confusion, contradiction, or eclecticism. Isaacs, for example, ... 评论家们从一个错误的前提（即H不能作intentional irony）推出一个错误结论，那么我们的作者该怎么批评他们呢？当然要驳倒其assumption，说H是能作intentional irony的。我们于是看到了D选项，intentional的完美的同义词：well-considered。从本题中可以体会出，对于句子的阅读能力是多么重要！
type	复杂修饰+题干圈套
score	5

Reinforce Raisin Author Passage Criticism Responses Sun Q26