| Front | 22: A mandatory order was refused by the courts in Bula Ltd v. Tara Mines Ltd (No.2) [1987] IR 95 because: A) The obligation imposed on the respondents was insufficiently certain to enable the respondents to understand their obligations and to enable the court to determine whether or not they were complying. B) Damages were inadequate for the applicants and were adequate compensation for the respondents. C) The cost of carrying out the order was wholly disproportionate to the benefit derived by the applicant. D) All of the above. |
|---|---|
| Back | A |
Learn with these flashcards. Click next, previous, or up to navigate to more flashcards for this subject.
Next card: Months order rule rsc summons force than? b
Previous card: Applicant unable situations court award mareva injunction show
Up to card list: Civil law