R Seeking Order A’s Restraining Leaving Anton Pillar

16:

In which of the following situations would the applicant be most likely to obtain injunctive relief?

A) A is seeking a Bayer Order restraining R from leaving the jurisdiction. R has already refused to comply with an Anton Pillar order for which he’s facing a charge of contempt. The date set for the contempt hearing is one month from now. R is about to fly to Rio De Janeiro to attend his daughter’s wedding and is expected back sometime within the next two weeks. 

B) A is seeking a Mareva injunction restraining R from withdrawing money from his current account. Accepting that R may indeed have day-to-day expenses, A is willing to concede that the entire account cannot be frozen. Furthermore, given that R has extremely limited access to his savings account, A does not seek a similar freeze on it and therefore does not disclose the account’s existence to the court.

C) A is seeking an Anton Pillar order in an effort to prevent R from destroying confidential industry documents. The documents in question pertain to a discovery made by A’s scientists regarding the distilling process of alcohol. It is hoped that with this information, A’s company will revolutionise the production process of alcohol and thus gain a substantial lead in the market. R, it was revealed, was masquerading as a janitor and is recorded on CCTV leaving A’s premises with the documents stuffed in his bag. A insists on bringing his own solicitor, as opposed to an independent third party solicitor to oversee the execution of the order. 

D) A is seeking…..a feck it, it’s not D)