Apedia

Murder Argument Adverse Consequences E.G God Meting Punishment

This card explains the argument from adverse consequences using examples related to divine reward/punishment and trial outcomes, plus an example concerning Donald Trump.

Tato karta vysvětluje argument z nepříznivých následků pomocí příkladů týkajících se božské odměny/trestu a výsledků soudních řízení, a také příklad týkající se Donalda Trumpa.

Fallacy argument from adverse consequences
Definition and Examples (e.g., A God meting out punishment and reward must exist, because if He didn’t, society would be much more lawless and dangerous — perhaps even ungovernable. Or: The defendant in a widely publicized murder trial must be found guilty; otherwise, it will be an encouragement for other men to murder their wives)

"Donald Trump won't get elected because that would mean horrible things for the world"

Tags: fallacies

Learn with these flashcards. Click next, previous, or up to navigate to more flashcards for this subject.

Next card: Evidence ufos absence appeal ignorance claim proved false

Previous card: Fallacy false choice type informal involves situation limited

Up to card list: Obscure but useful english vocab, logical fallacies and CBT